Evidence Synthesis
Systematic Reviews & Evidence Synthesis
Rigorous evidence synthesis for researchers and postgraduate students — from protocol and search strategy through screening, extraction, and synthesis to a manuscript-ready review.
This service fits when
- You need a systematic review or meta-analysis for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
- Your graduate program requires a rigorous evidence synthesis chapter or a standalone review.
- You need a scoping review to map an emerging field before committing to a study.
- You started a review and need it completed to a publishable standard.
What this service solves
A defensible evidence synthesis requires a reproducible search, consistent screening, disciplined extraction, and transparent reporting. Most reviews fail peer review on process, not topic: undocumented searches, inconsistent eligibility decisions, and numbers that cannot be traced. This service produces the review — and the audit trail behind it.
What you receive
Review protocol
Word
StandardDocumented search strategy per database, with dates and result counts
Word + Excel
StandardPRISMA flow diagram
Editable + image
StandardScreening and eligibility documentation
Excel
StandardData extraction tables
Excel + Word
StandardRisk-of-bias / quality appraisal using a tool appropriate to the included designs
Word + Excel
StandardSynthesis: structured narrative or meta-analysis with forest plots, as the data permit
Word + figures
StandardManuscript-ready review formatted to your target journal or university template
Word
StandardVerifiable reference library
RIS/BibTeX + list
StandardIndependent authenticity certificate (Copyleaks)
Included
- Refinement of the review question within the agreed topic
- Reporting-standard alignment — PRISMA 2020 or PRISMA-ScR as applicable
- Formatting to your target journal's author guidelines or university template
- One structured revision round within the approved scope
Not included
- Journal acceptance — no provider controls editorial decisions
- Journal submission fees or article processing charges
- PROSPERO registration — we prepare the registration-ready protocol; you register it under your name
- Primary data collection or ethics approvals
What we need from you
- 01Your research question or topic area — even a rough one
- 02Target journal or institution, with template or author guidelines if available
- 03Your deadline
- 04Any existing work — protocol, partial search, or screening — if it exists
- 05Preferred review type, if known; we advise if not
How this service runs
- 01
Scope review
We clarify the question, feasibility, and the right review type. Free of charge.
- 02
Written scope
Review type, databases, deliverables, timeline, and a fixed price — approved by you before work begins.
- 03
Protocol & search
Eligibility criteria and a documented, reproducible search across the agreed databases.
- 04
Screening & extraction
Consistent eligibility decisions and disciplined data extraction, fully documented.
- 05
Synthesis
Structured narrative synthesis, or meta-analysis with forest plots where the data permit.
- 06
Quality control & verification
The full check set below, plus authenticity screening where included.
- 07
Delivery & revision
Complete package delivered; one structured in-scope revision round included.
Quality controls for this service
- Search reproducibility — strategies re-run and reconciled against reported counts
- Eligibility consistency — screening decisions checked against the stated criteria
- Extraction spot-verification against source studies
- Citation integrity — every reference corresponds to a real, checkable source
- Numerical reconciliation across text, tables, figures, and the PRISMA flow
- Reporting-standard checklist completed — PRISMA 2020 / PRISMA-ScR
Full detail: Quality & Verification
Verified
- Originality and AI-content screening through Copyleaks, with the certificate delivered — where included in scope
- Citation traceability — any reference can be followed to its source
Not guaranteed
- Journal acceptance or peer-reviewer opinions
- That pooling will be statistically appropriate — if meta-analysis is not defensible, we say so and document why
All project material is handled under our confidentiality policy — project-team access only, no reuse, deletion on request.
Turnaround
Depends on review breadth and the number of eligible studies. The timeline is fixed in your written scope before you commit.
Pricing
Driven by databases covered, expected record volume, synthesis type (narrative vs meta-analysis), languages, and timeline. Free scope review; fixed written quote.
How pricing works →Revisions
One structured revision round within the approved scope is standard. Out-of-scope changes are re-quoted in writing — never silently billed.
Systematic Reviews & Evidence Synthesis — questions
Can you do a meta-analysis?
Yes — where the included studies report compatible data. If pooling is not statistically defensible, we say so, document why, and deliver a structured narrative synthesis instead.
Do you register the protocol on PROSPERO?
We prepare the registration-ready protocol. Registration itself is completed under your name, because registries record the review team's identity.
Which reporting standard do you follow?
PRISMA 2020 for systematic reviews and PRISMA-ScR for scoping reviews, unless your journal or institution mandates a different standard.
Can you finish a review I already started?
Yes. We audit what exists, state plainly what can be kept, and scope only the remaining work.
Scope this project.
Describe your project on WhatsApp. You'll receive a written scope — deliverables, timeline, and a fixed price — before you commit to anything.
